On this day of this year, 11 November 2019, we celebrate Veterans Day, but we should remember and thank them everyday, so thanks to all our Veterans.

‘Thank God for Deep State’, ex-CIA boss says. Still think it’s a conspiracy theory?😳

1 Nov, 2019 14:18 / Updated 2 hours ago. Credit goes to: REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/ RT Post. 😒 Pres. Kennedy, Pres. Reagan & British PM, Tony Blair, all tried to expose the “Deep State.” See-> https://www.rt.com/usa/472398-deep-state-ex-cia-boss/

Just a few short months, the US political establishment has gone from denying the existence of the ‘Deep State’ and calling it a conspiracy theory, to praising it as the bulwark of the Republic against President Donald Trump.
“Thank God for the ‘Deep State,’” declared former CIA director John E. McLaughlin at an event this week, describing the diplomats and intelligence officers testifying before the congressional impeachment inquiry as “people who are doing their duty or responding to a higher call.”
Lavishing praise on the ‘whistleblower’ intelligence officer whose complaint about Trump’s phone call launched the impeachment probe, McLaughlin said the intelligence community is “institutionally committed to objectivity and telling the truth.” 
Former CIA director John McLaughlin on Trump’s impeachment: “Thank God for the ‘Deep State’” pic.twitter.com/t4pQhFOBuj

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 31, 2019
One would think this might be a bit rich, coming from the former deputy director of the CIA at the time of the infamous ‘Iraqi WMDs’ fiasco – and acting director for a time in 2004 – but McLaughlin’s comments were met with applause by the crowd at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government.
He wasn’t the only one to praise the Deep State either. Sitting right next to him was John Brennan, the CIA director under President Barack Obama, whose fingerprints are all over the so-called ‘Steele dossier’ and ‘Russiagate’, and who is now enjoying a rewarding career as a TV pundit accusing Trump of treason. Brennan argued that the reason Trump “has a contentious relationship with the Deep State people… is because they tell the truth,” and praised the unelected intelligence and law enforcement officials for continuing to “do their work irrespective of what he’s going to do or say.”
.@JohnBrennan on the whistleblower coming from the intel community: They’re “ighting in the trenches here and overseas … I’m just pleased every day that my former colleagues in the intelligence community continue to do their duties.” pic.twitter.com/7YW9lkQMj0

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 31, 2019
Under normal circumstances, these admissions would be rather earth-shattering. It isn’t every day that former bosses of the intelligence apparatus basically admit that yes, they are meddling in the country’s politics, because they feel they have a “higher loyalty” – to borrow a phrase from ex-FBI boss James Comey, another member of this merry cabal – than to the chief executive elected by the American people.
Yet the response has been muted at best, with a silent shrug and the implicit “nothing to see here, move along” from the major outlets. That’s not particularly surprising, given the media’s role in the ‘Russiagate’ conspiracy. Why, just a couple weeks ago, the New York Times published an opinion piece praising the Deep State along the very same lines Brennan and McLaughlin would.
The deep state isn’t a secret, antidemocratic cabal. It’s a collection of public servants looking to guard the Republic against President Trump’s excesses, writes @mcottle. https://t.co/ejSkUrhMx7

— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) October 21, 2019
When Trump and his defenders talked about the Deep State during the ‘Russiagate’ hysteria, the very same outlets pooh-poohed them as insane, paranoid, and delusional. Now they say the Deep State is real, it’s always been real, and it’s acting in the best interests of the American Republic – and if you don’t believe it, you’re the one who’s insane, paranoid and delusional. Sense a pattern?
Whatever one may think of Trump, it beggars belief that the very people who cry the loudest about “our democracy” are elevating an unelected bureaucracy, spies and counter-spies as the arbiters of it. It almost makes you think the people responsible for pushing the ‘Russian meddling’ conspiracy theory may have done it as a smokescreen for their own (mis)deeds.

Conversation (77): Please read the RT Community Commenting Rules here

Aside from the fact that the Ukraine phone call transcript reveals no crime having been committed (this whole impeachment farce is just political games by the Left), the idea that the CIA is committed to “truth” and “objectivity” is insane.

Deep state is the utmost evil and biggest threat facing humanity.

The US Deep State is what wants US-Russia bad relations and more US Middle East involvement! This is incredible bad US policy by the Deep State agenda which no elected politician can overcome! President Kennedy had plans to shut down the CIA and withdraw all US from Vietnam by the end of 1965 but rogue elements within the Deep State took him out!

The Deep State isn’t just CIA and FBI thugs, it’s mindless mobs of AntiFa, #resist, every stinking registered Democrat. You cannot fight the Deep State without attacking its roots.

This “deep state” has zero repsect for national and international law, is wholesale lawless and criminal and there’s nothing to applaud about. They are a collective of the most criminal, morals-lacking, cutthoaths holding a deadly grip on the future of mankind.

Sounds like a fourth branch of government. Checks and balances, baby! This ⚖ not this ☭

Ex-CIA director says, “The Truth Will Set You Free – To Do Whatever The Fonk They Want.”

The deep state is the aristocracy planted inside a superficial democracy.

Something like Synarchy. Occasionally you see the edges of it like Iran-Contra and through NATO with the CIA stay-behind networks.

CIA = TRUTH?! That’s a laugh. I needed that. He forgot Pompeo admitting the CIA taught him to lie. Arrest them all for High treason. Debils.

What fools. They actually think that God is behind them when they murder thousands of innocent people,bankrupt nations and foster famine and disease worldwide. Just who could be their God?

They believe that they are God so the statement is self-congratulatory.

Satan. They worship and participate in rituals sacrificing and abusing children for him. They became his children – a soulless creatures. They do whatever he wishes them to do. They call themselves dead. They have nothing to care about except destroying other life. This just a tip of an iceberg it goes deeper than that…

Psychos, psychos everywhere.

No One from the “Deep State” has whistle blown on 9/11 as far as I know and been taken seriously and those who have spoken out have just disappeared..

You can never open that door because by doing so it acknowledges that the US created “sacred victims” out of people that they were supposed to protect.

A man who would serve as CIA Director made it clear back in the days of the Warren Commission that members of CIA are free to lie, to perjure themselves, without consequence. I think that should always be kept in mind.

Deep State swamp is showing it’s ugly head… it’s ugly and it’s in control

It seems the deep state must believe they are almost in total control, or they wouldn’t have their mouthpiece, New York Times, publicity outing their existence.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Credit & Thanks to The Authors of these Articles & to RT (Russia Today)

Meddling in journalism: Google funding media to fulfill Radical Liberal Agenda

See—> https://www.rt.com/op-ed/472399-google-liberal-funding-media/

The world’s most powerful company claims political bias plays no role in its day-to-day operations. Yet how do we explain its funding of left-leaning media amid elections and calls to regulate the Silicon Valley monolith? The world’s most powerful company claims political bias plays no role in its day-to-day operations. Yet how do we explain its funding of left-leaning media amid elections and calls to regulate the Silicon Valley monolith?

Google, headquartered in Mountain View, California, has announced recently it will be funding 34 media organizations in North America – 29 in the US, four in Canada, and one that has remained undisclosed. The project is being undertaken by the so-called Google News Initiative (GNI), a three-year, $300 million effort designed to “help journalism thrive in the digital age.” Too bad that so few people thought to ask, however, if it is really Google’s job to meddle in journalism.

The fact that Google is financing media organizations at all is in itself very problematic. After all, from the time of its founding, the search engine giant was expected to remain a neutral platform from which clients could freely access a variety of news and information; the more popular selections among users would automatically rise – in pure democratic fashion – to the top of the searches. However, in our post-Russiagate, fake news media hell-scape, Google has taken it upon itself to manually steer the algorithms, which in effect gives audiences a distorted perception of reality. Let’s call it the ‘Google reality’.

This leads to the critical question: Why does Google spend so much of its funds “supporting the future of journalism”? Does the generosity come without any strings attached, or does Google expect something in return for its money? Like any major corporation whose major concern is the bottom line and continual growth, it’s safe to say Google is looking for some quid pro quo. And that is exactly the conclusion that can be drawn judging by recent events, which include not only the most momentous and consequential presidential election in recent memory, but an American public that is growing wary of Google’s immense power and influence. Here’s where it gets interesting. As GTP pointed out in its report, Google tends to get very generous with handouts during those times when it is confronted with “legal and regulatory threats.”

READ MORE: ‘We are moving into a new, controlled society worse than old totalitarianism’ – Zizek on Google leak

Thus, it can’t just be written off as coincidence theory that Google is attempting to build a cozy, cash-cushioned relationship with various media organizations at a time when US politicians, like Elizabeth Warren, as well as numerous antitrust regulators, are speaking about smashing up the behemoth IT company into tiny bite-sized pieces. At the same time, Google senior executives have even been asked to testify before Congress on the question of their alleged political bias. Clearly, Google is feeling some heat. Whether all of this is just empty chatter for public consumption amid a contentious election cycle remains unclear, but Google doesn’t seem to be taking any chances.

This state of affairs presents a serious dilemma for the cash-strapped media industry where advertising dollars are shrinking and publications are going out of business. In this current period of uncertainty, the world of journalism is growing increasingly dependent for its revenue on Google, which wields, in addition to fantastic wealth, enough algorithmic firepower to determine if a media outlet should, quite literally, live or die. That is a frightening thing to consider. When a media organization is forced to operate under a virtual algorithmic Sword of Damocles, it will become much more cautious about biting the hand that feeds it.
Since its founding in 1998, Google was guided by the simple motto, ‘Don’t be evil’. That memo to itself carried the implicit understanding that the company, by virtue of it being the world’s clearinghouse of news and information, could wreak real havoc if it wanted to.

In recent months, a string of whistleblowers (here, here, and here) began to pull back the company’s heavy curtain, which revealed more than just a bunch of fun-loving computer nerds enjoying generous campus perks, like bean-bag chairs, free food and on-site fitness club. Insiders, like James Damore, a former Google engineer-turned whistleblower, described a radically different atmosphere behind the feel-good facade. Despite these PC-conscious and very woke times, Damore said that being a political conservative at Google in 2017 is like “being gay in the 1950s.”

If Google displays this sort of intolerance to its employees who espouse right-leaning views, then it is reasonable to ask if the company is monkeying with its algorithms to prevent conservative and alternative media from receiving fair representation in the competitive field of search results. Judging by damning documents released by whistleblowers, which include a blacklist top-heavy with conservative voices, the company is (allegedly) working overtime to manipulate the political landscape to its liking. In other words, to “prevent the next Trump situation,” as one senior Google executive candidly admitted to an undercover reporter from Project Veritas. Google denies that it plays political favorites, yet the record strongly suggests otherwise.

All things considered, Google is creating the conditions for a digitalized form of tyranny where they have become empowered, through their direct influence in newsrooms worldwide, to determine not only what political message the public hears above all others. It has purchased the power to ensure that the media never turns its investigative attention on Google’s global empire, which, for the time being, remains practically above the law. The world of media should have never allowed itself to get trapped in such a relationship.
Google’s ability to literally alter reality with the manipulation of its algorithms represents one of the deepest threats to democracy today, and must be challenged. Even by those media organizations that benefit from Google’s immense wealth.
@Robert_Bridge
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Also see—> https://www.rt.com/op-ed/466593-google-censorship-political-bias
Google is censoring political content? Gasp! Who knew? By:Danielle Ryan
Danielle Ryan is an Irish freelance writer based in Dublin. Her work has appeared in Salon, The Nation, Rethinking Russia, teleSUR, RBTH, The Calvert Journal and others. Follow her on Twitter @DanielleRyanJ

The latest leaks about Google’s clandestine political censorship are fascinating — but they’re not going to knock anyone’s socks off for shock factor. Who, at this stage, does not know what Google is up to?
Former Google employee Zachary Vorhies told Project Veritas that he spent a year collecting documents that prove Google uses a politically biased “fringe ranking” system and maintains a “blacklist” of undesirable websites. 
Surprise, surprise! Our Silicon Valley overlords have “deboosted and deranked” websites that fall foul of its own agenda.

Coverage of Vorhies’ leaks has been minimal, with the exception of right wing websites, many of which found themselves banished to the “blacklist.” Liberal media has mostly ignored the leaks. This is primarily because Project Veritas is led by arch-conservative James O’Keefe and they are naturally loathe to cover any information he brings to light, regardless of how legitimate it might be.
The group has uncovered some enlightening information in the past; most embarrassingly, it caught a CNN reporter admitting that the Russiagate story, which consumed American media for the better part of three years, was “mostly bullsh*t” but that it had been “incredible” for ratings.

 
The Daily Beast did cover the leaks — but with the sole purpose of questioning Vorhies’ credibility. The guy, it appears, is a pusher of the QAnon conspiracy theory, who has dabbled in Pizzagate and has written some anti-semitic tweets. Even O’Keefe acknowledged this, tweeting on Wednesday that “not every source is a perfect angel.”

 
If his information is accurate, Vorhies’ personal interests shouldn’t be relevant. Then again, when it was revealed that the DNC rigged the 2016 primary against Bernie Sanders, the only thing CNN and friends wanted to talk about was Russia.
There is a mythology that says Google, Facebook and Twitter are concerned only with censoring conservative views. O’Keefe even bemoans Google’s “scary, progressive social agenda.” There is some truth to that as far as social issues like abortion are concerned, but that’s where Google’s “progressive agenda” ends.
This idea stems partly from the fact that Google consistently ranks “left-leaning” sites like the New York Times, the Washington Post, MSNBC and CNN higher in terms of credibility than right-leanings websites. Some important context is needed here, though. The right-wing Breitbart considers CNN to be “far-left” — a classification the actual “far-left” would find hilarious, to say the very least. 
We’ve known for years that Google actively de-ranks socialist websites and genuinely subversive left-leaning content — a category CNN and crew (which are as down-the-line centrist as it gets) do not come close to falling into.
Google is not a slave to “the left” —  it’s simply a slave to the status quo and neoliberalism. So, don’t expect corporate media to start worrying about that any time soon.

 
Google is the best example of tech entrepreneurs becoming so rich and powerful that they no longer run a business but an experiment of world domination. Larry and Sergey can now pick our leaders to shape the world the way they want it to be. What happened to ‘don’t be evil’? by: Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 15, 2019
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

😏 I’ve come to the conclusion that a bikini could be the greatest symbol of Democracy:
It separates the left and the right, protects the center, changes our point of view and forces everybody to look in the same direction and with the same objective. You don’t have to see eye-to-eye to see the point. What do you think… Good Symbol? 🤔😀

READ MORE: https://neonnettle.com/features/1396-new-york-times-reveals-soros-clinton-paid-women-to-accuse-trump-of-rape
© Neon Nettle

Evidence has emerged that money tied to Hillary Clinton and George Soros was used to pay women to make-up false claims that President Trump sexually assaulted them, according to a bombshell report in the New York Times. Writing for the Hill, investigative reporter John Solomon, reveals that payouts were made by attorney Lisa Bloom to women who were willing to come forward claiming that they were sexually harassed by Donald Trump. Whatever it takes to sink Trump… the next few months are going to get bloody… better protect your ass ets. 😳

Go to –> https://neonnettle.com/features/1396-new-york-times-reveals-soros-clinton-paid-women-to-accuse-trump-of-rape Credit to NY Times

😀 Today, We Celebrate Columbus Day & Indigenous People’s Day…
THE FOLLOWING IS A BRIEF HISTORY OF “AMERICA’S HISTORY”

As a child, most of us learned that Columbus “discovered” what later became known as America, on 12 Oct 1492, 527 years ago. We celebrate Columbus Day on the 2nd Monday in October.

There is another day we also celebrate on this day. it is “Indigenous People’’s Day”… the People who were here long before Columbus, or even the Vikings. In 1499-1502, Amerigo Vespucci sailed to the “New Land,” wrote about it and In 1507, a German cartographer, Martin Waldseemüller, using information from Vespucci, made a map and called the new land “America.” He was unaware of Columbus’ journey here and assumed Vespucci had made the discovery. Mistakes were made: first, Columbus thought he had reached India and henceforth, he called the Indigenous People here, “Indians.” Second: The “New Land,” our continent bears the first name (a variation of) Amerigo Vespucci, who was the second…or third or forth of Europeans to “discover the Western Hemisphere.

Obviously, since many people were already here, “They” or their predecessors had “discovered what we now call America long before… in fact thousands of years before, probably by crossing the ice shelf/bridge from Asia, or the connected Alaskan-Siberian peninsula before the Bering Strait developed separating the two continents. There is another possibility that a European People crossed over the ice shelf into what is now Nunavut, Canada and migrated southward into Eastern North America.

In the absence of empirical knowledge, artifacts, building ruins, burial sites and mounds, skeletons and other evidence, combined with perceived logic gives us the following historical sequences. The “CLOVIS” People occupied Eastern and East Central USA lands by 12 to 15,000+ years ago according to evidence found.

Other pre-second-millennium Indigenous People included the Adena Giants, the Anasazi Chacoan and other Pueblo Cultures, who build the great stone structures in the USA Southwest, including the Cliff-Cave structures in Canyon de Chille in NE Arizona, etc. Other Indigenous people were the Mound Builders of the Midwest and those of the Megaliths in the East. Later came the Athabascans (or Athapaskans sometime called the Dené); the Algonquins of the East and the Eskimos… the Aleuts and Inuits of the North.

A few of the “modern” many Indian tribes which we know the most about are the Apache, Cherokee, Chippewa, Comanche, Hopi, Iroquois, Navajo, Sioux, Zuni, etc. The Navajo in Arizona and New Mexico, and the Cherokee, primarily in North Carolina and Oklahoma, are the largest surviving Indian tribes in the USA. There are many other officially recognized Indigenous peoples in the Americas and a few “created” tribes who own legal gambling centers.

Today, there are approximately 3.0 million single-race plus 2.3 million mixed-race Indigenous People in North America… and on this day, we celebrate their lives, their cultures and traditions and hope that they accept us… their Black, Brown and White neighbors to their Land.

There are some people who want us to give up celebrating Columbus Day in favor of only celebrating Indigenous People Day. However, I think there is room in our culture to celebrate both… even though both our Continent and the Indigenous People were mistakenly misnamed. So, my friends: “Happy Indigenous People’s Day… and Happy Columbus Day.”😀

THREE YEARS AGO I POSTED THIS PICTURE AND QUOTE. TODAY, I POST IT AGAIN. “WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE?”

US Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens and three other Americans, Info. Mgmt. Officer Sean Smith and two CIA contractors, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, both ex-navy seals, we killed by Islamists in the attack at the Embassy on 11 September 2012 Hillary Clinton, then Sec of State, and the Obama Administration claimed no Improprieties occurred even when it was known that additional security had been denied following Ambassador Stevens’ official requests.

After a lengthy investigation, and after Clinton, Obamas and Democrat leaders claimed no responsiblity for the deaths of the four Americans, and others killed and injured in the attack, Hillary Clinton was quoted as saying: “What difference at this point does it make?”

1- Well now, after three years, thousand of man-hours and millions of dollars have been spent investigating Russia’s looking into, spying on and “meddling with” our 2016 elections, to have a leg-up on probable winners and adjusting their financial and investment planning, etc.; and…

2- Trump’s communications with Russians, both before and after the election, which have not proven to have been illegal in any way, or detrimental to our national security. etc.: and…

3- Trump’s asking Ukraine’s new President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into any improprieties and corruption regarding then Vice President and his son. Joe Biden admits using the office of the Vice Presidency to intimidate the Ukrainian government. Biden admitted he pressured Ukraine’s then-President Petro Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor investigating his son Hunter Biden for approximately $3,000,000 payments he received from an oligarch-owned gas company, Burisma Holdings. Biden claimed that the prosecutor investigating his son, Viktor Shokin, was corrupt, and informed Poroshenko that Ukraine would be denied a billion dollars of foreign aid if Shokin wasn’t fired. So, VP Biden threatened/bribed then president Porchenko to ensure his son’s activities for receiving millions of dollars from a suspicious oil company were covered up. Corruption at it’s best.

So now, I will do something that I never dreamed I would do… I will quote Hillary Clinton and say: “WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE?”

Angus Beef is often considered the best, but…

Is the beef you are buying really “Angus”? Most people don’t have access to, nor can afford Kobe or Wagyu beef, so they buy Angus, which they believe is the next best thing. Beef grading has improved from what it was previously, but the Angus beef you pay extra for doesn’t ensure that it is really “Angus.”

There is a difference between Purebred “Registered” Angus Beef and store-brand “Angus Beef” or even “Certified Angus Beef.” Registered Angus Beef have to be “Purebred,” 100% Angus or at least 5th generation, cross-bred, 31/32 Angus Beef.

I’ll explain cross-bred Angus beef. An Angus bull is bred to a Hereford (red-brown, white-faced) beef cow or a Holstein (black & white) dairy cow, etc. Angus are smaller than Herefords, Holsteins, etc and an Angus cow has more trouble giving birth to a large calf, so an Angus bull sires the cross-bred calf.

If a purebred Angus (black) bull and a purebred Hereford (red-brown, white-faced,neck & ankles) cow, the off-spring will be a black, white-faced calf. If that calf is a bull (50% Angus-Hereford) and is then bred back to a Hereford cow, the result is still a mostly black, white faced calf…now only 25% Angus. This can be continued a 3rd and 4th time and the offspring becomes less black, yet still may resemble an Angus, but is larger and produces more meat when sold.

Just like tomatoes, corn or wheat, hybrids (crossbred) are normally bigger and perform better than 100% pure blood (or plant) lines, and produce more fruit, grain, or meat, and are therefore, prominently used because they are more drought, insect and disease resistant and and therefore are more consistently and abundantly productive.

So, the next time you consume an “Angus” burger or steak, don’t bet your ass ets that you are eating 100% Angus beef. It may be a great burger or steak, but in may not be “Angus.” 😳 … So, ALWAYS BUY & ENJOY “CERTIFIED ANGUS BEEF.” 👍😀

Hereford and Angus continue to “bump-heads” to see who is best. 🐂 😉

Records…Hidden…Disappearing…Strange.
OhBama… A Barry suspiciously “placed” President.
Factual Research shows that: People in the know,
including the government, Know the Following:

1- Who and What he was and is and directed intensions;
2- Where is is really from, and where he grew up;
3- Who his sponsors and “puppeteers” were/are;
4- How he got his fake documents, including his SSN;
5- Why he was “set-up” to be President of the USA;
6- What his religious up-brings were and where; and…
7- What happened to those who tried to expose him.

Did you ever watch the interviews, read the books or
see the movies by the two guys who were going to
“Tell All” about Obama back in 2008 and 2012? Did you?
Well, I didn’t either. They could have made millions, yet,
they just disappeared…never to be heard from again.

All of this MAY come out someday…or maybe not.
He is the only president to have hidden his records,
and his records may remain “black” (sealed) forever.
We may never know… strange… really strange.

See—> https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/obamas-occidental-college-transcripts-indonesian-national-islamic-religion/

It’s Sports…Not Academics That Are Important Today

That extremely liberal country, just west of Arizona and Nevada, just passed a bill to pay student athletes for their services…for playing. Mind you, they already get payed in many ways, e.g., Celebrity status, money, sex, special privileges, free get out of jail free cards, paid tutoring, etc, and are often given a “B” for “D” level academics… whatever it takes to maintain a “C” level grade. Oh well, we all know that sports are more important than academics, so it is only fitting that we appropriately reward these futures multi-millionaires for the games they play.

I therefore, recommend that all institutes of higher learning adopt the following administrative structure and compensation for their sports…I mean academic institutions:

1- The University or College President will always be the Captain… the Quarterback of the Football team and compensated $5 million per year., plus appropriate performance bonuses of course. The main Quarterback will always be the Captain.

2- The Captain of the Basketball team will be the institute’s Provost or Vice-President and will be compensated $4 million per year, plus bonuses. The Star player will always be the Captain.

3- The Deans and other top executives will be the Captains of the Baseball, Soccer, etc, and compensated $3 million per year, plus bonuses.

4- All first-string players will be paid 80% of what their team captain receives, and all second-string players will receive 60% of the captain’s pay.

5- The Team Coach (for each team) will receive Twice of what his average player gets for a Winning season, and Half for a Losing season. He will be rewarded for his performance. Just like the MP in the British Parliament; A team, or Media/Public vote of “No-Confidence,” and he’s out.

6- Preparation for a long-term career, success in civilization and possibly governance is always second to that of a winning sports team, and the millions to be made by both players and the institution.

7- Preparing students for a good, secure, life-long career is a thing of the past. We are only in business to make “Super Stars” now. Anything less is unacceptable.

8- Oh yeah, one more thing: All Women in sports will make 20% of their male counterparts in their respective sports, but will not be part of the institutions administration.

9- I almost forgot… A person born Male, but becomes a Woman, will always compete in and be compensated as a Male in the sport that He will obviously excel at. Women refer to them as “Ding-Dongs,” but what what the hell, they have a definite advantage and will normally win. That’s what is important.

10- Remember… in today’s World, it’s all about the MONEY… the Superstars…the “Show,” the.. Billionaires. That is what is important. It will all be the LAW soon.😳